跳到正文

Nathan Lambert回应有关中国模型训练芯片的说法

Nathan Lambert · X转述· @natolambert·· 4 小时前精选

275 次浏览 · 0 赞 · 0 转发 (收录时)

原文
谁
Nathan Lambert
引文
I thought people already thought/knew this?

发生了什么

Nathan Lambert在引用Will Depue关于开源模型权重取证分析的帖子时问道:“我以为大家早就这么认为/知道了?”Depue称,这项分析将六个中国模型与NVIDIA Blackwell系统联系起来,并表示OpenAI和Anthropic的资深研究人员已独立核实这些发现。

推荐理由

Lambert简短的回应将据称发现的硬件情况描述为他以为早已广为人知的事;他引用的帖子则介绍了取证方法及其相关说法。

接下来读什么

查看这件事的完整进展Nathan Lambert Reacts to Claims About Chinese Models’ Blackwell Training
正文 · 中文版本尚未就绪(原文)

I thought people already thought/knew this?

引用will depue@willdepue

I have a major result to share.

I’ve found conclusive forensic evidence that the top 4 Chinese AI labs—DeepSeek, Moonshot, MiniMax and Ant Group—have built their newest models on NVIDIA’s most advanced Blackwell chips, which are barred from export to China.

This sounds insane, but I discovered that almost every AI model carries a hidden signature of the GPU that trained it. When a model is first set up, the starting values of its weights are laid out in a pattern that depends on the exact GPU. Each combination of GPU and seed number produces a unique pattern—a sort of fingerprint of the hardware used to create the model. Traces of that pattern survive training into the published model.

Again, this evidence isn’t based on any insider information or leaking. It’s based on a forensic analysis of the model weights released by the companies themselves.

I searched more than six trillion combinations of chip layout and seed number and matched them to open-weights models. In doing so, I found conclusive evidence that six Chinese AI models—including DeepSeek-V4-Pro, Kimi K3, and MiniMax-M3—were initialized on NVIDIA Blackwell systems. Four of the models match Grace Blackwell, the GB200 and GB300 parts in NVIDIA’s flagship liquid-cooled rack-scale systems.

I then verified these results on real hardware. Running unmodified PyTorch with the seeds I’d recovered, a Blackwell B300 reproduced DeepSeek-V4-Flash’s untouched starting weights bit for bit, and a rented GB200 reproduced Kimi K3’s to a correlation of 0.999995. A Hopper H100 reproduced none of DeepSeek-V4-Flash’s, and changing the seed by one broke the match. (DeepSeek’s seed is 953049583 by the way.) The method also was verified to match 24 known open-weights models to the hardware that developers said they used.

It is exceedingly unlikely that these results are a coincidence. Across six trillion combinations, the best accidental match should reach only about 8 sigma (i.e., eight standard deviations above what random chance would produce). The real matches range from 49 to 1,385 sigma, and even the weakest single test hits 20.

These were data-center-scale training runs. With some analysis of release schedules and model details, I estimate that the largest, Kimi K3 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro, used 2,000 to 3,000 Blackwell GPUs each. Clusters of this size cost on the order of $150 to $200 million each to buy, and across these labs alone would add up to more than half a billion dollars of export-controlled GPUs, not counting experimental compute or otherwise. It’s quite likely that we see multi-billion dollar expenditure on export-controlled GPUs.

I am highly confident in this result, and it has been independently verified by senior researchers at OpenAI and Anthropic. You can read the full report at unemploymentlabs.com/checkpoi….

There is much more I’ve identified about these models through other forms of checkpoint forensics like this, and will have more to share soon.

在 X 查看被引用的帖子

这件事到目前为止

Nathan Lambert questioned whether Will Depue’s claims about Chinese models using NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs were already known. Depue said a forensic analysis of open model weights matched six Chinese models to Blackwell systems and that senior researchers at OpenAI and Anthropic independently verified the findings.

这条收录于 11月13日 AI 日报看这一期日报的全部内容