9251 次浏览 · 80 赞 · 1 转发 (收录时)
Artificial Analysis 推出生命科学视觉推理 VIALS 排行榜
- 谁
- Artificial Analysis
- 时间
- 引文
We’re launching VIALS-AA, a leaderboard for Handshake AI’s VIALS benchmark for visual reasoning in life sciences and biotech research
发生了什么
Artificial Analysis 正在推出 VIALS-AA,这是 Handshake AI 的 VIALS 基准测试排行榜。该基准测试涵盖生命科学和生物技术八个领域的 161 项任务,用于评估视觉推理能力。模型在 Stirrup 智能体运行框架中对每项任务运行三次,答案由 GPT-6 Luna(medium)评分;排行榜报告三次运行均被判定为正确的比例。Gemini 4 Carbon(high)以 64% 领先,其次是 GPT-6 Astra(max),为 63%;Claude Opus 5.5(max with fallback)为 61%。
接下来读什么
查看这件事的完整进展Artificial Analysis Launches VIALS-AA Leaderboard for Life Sciences Visual ReasoningWe’re launching VIALS-AA, a leaderboard for Handshake AI’s VIALS benchmark for visual reasoning in life sciences and biotech research
Visual artifacts are central to how scientists analyze experiments and make research decisions, but interpreting them correctly remains a challenge for frontier models. VIALS’ 161 tasks span eight domains and need models to reason over artifacts including gel blots, flow cytometry plots, plasmid maps, and phylogenies. Each task requires models to interpret an artifact and draw a specific scientific conclusion.
We evaluate models by running each task three times in Stirrup, our open source agent harness, with code execution and image inspection tools. GPT-6 Luna (medium) grades each answer against the reference answer, and we report the share of tasks judged correct in all three repeats (pass^3).
Key takeaways:
➤ The top three models are separated by 3 points: Gemini 4 Carbon (high) from @GoogleDeepMind leads narrowly with 64%, followed by GPT-6 Astra (max) from @OpenAI at 63% and Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) from @AnthropicAI at 61%
➤ Astra and Sol achieve similar scores to Opus and Sonnet at a much lower Cost per Task: Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) averages $1.64 per task, ~29× as much as Sol (~$0.056). This price difference is significantly driven by turn use - GPT-6 Astra (max) and GPT-6.1 Sol (max) average ~8 turns per task, compared with ~27 for Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) and ~25 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)
➤ Open weights models trail the highest score by ~19 points: Kimi K3.1 Pro leads open weights models on VIALS-AA at 45%, narrowly ahead of MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 43%
➤ 14 of 161 tasks saw safety refusals on at least one model: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) refused on 6 tasks, the most of any model, and half of the 14 affected tasks saw refusals from multiple models
Thank you to @joinHandshakeAI and the VIALS authors for creating the benchmark and collaborating with us on bringing it to Artificial Analysis!
这件事到目前为止
Artificial Analysis launched VIALS-AA, a leaderboard for Handshake AI’s VIALS benchmark, which tests visual reasoning across 161 tasks in eight life sciences and biotech domains. Gemini 4 Carbon (high) leads with 64%, followed by GPT-6 Astra (max) at 63% and Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) at 61%. Models run each task three times in the Stirrup agent harness. GPT-6 Luna (medium) grades the answers, and the leaderboard reports the share of tasks judged correct in all three runs.
每天一封,跟上 AI 的重要变化
模型发布、价格变化、算力进展,附原始来源。免费,确认后开始发送,随时一键退订。 看一份往期日报 · 2026-11-06
