Skip to content
Viewing history for · This page does not vary by date2026年10月20日 周二‹ Previous dayNext day ›AccelerationBack to now

MiniMax Releases M3.1 Flash With Higher Benchmark Scores and Lower Task Costs Than M3

4 reports 4 reporting sources 11 days agoNew

Understand the event

AI overview

MiniMax released MiniMax-M3.1-Flash through its API, and Artificial Analysis measured a higher Intelligence Index score and lower cost per Index task than MiniMax-M3. At maximum effort, the new model scored 42 versus M3’s 29, tying GLM-5.3-Flash and trailing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 at 45. Artificial Analysis estimated costs at approximately $0.22 per Index task, compared with $0.51 for M3. The model supports text and image inputs with up to one million tokens of context. The Decoder reported API prices of $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens. QbitAI reported prices of 1 yuan per million input tokens, 4 yuan per million output tokens and 0.1 yuan per million cache-read tokens, and cited overall usage costs 70% below M3. Its weights remain closed, with MiniMax planning an open-weights release on October 23. Artificial Analysis also found a weakness on AA-Omniscience: the model answered 56% of questions correctly but attempted almost every question, yielding a reported hallucination rate of 93% and an overall score of 16 on that evaluation.

Generated by AI from reports · Updated 10 days ago

Read next

More changes in today’s briefingConfigure the ChatGPT desktop app with Amazon Bedrock in AWS GovCloud (US)

Models in this story

Developments

2 developments

  1. 10/20 02:22 (UTC+8) · 2 reports
    MiniMax releases the M3.1 Flash reasoning model
    量子位:MiniMax releases M3.1 Flash with stronger agent benchmarks and lower pricing
  2. 10/19 23:58 (UTC+8) · 1 reports
    Artificial Analysis Benchmarks MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
    Artificial Analysis · X:MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 42 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at lower task cost

Report timeline

Follow the reports to explore different sides of the event.

10/20
  1. MiniMax releases M3.1 Flash with stronger agent benchmarks and lower pricing

    MiniMax released M3.1 Flash, identified by QbitAI as the model previously tested anonymously as Space Bunny on OpenRouter. The report cites 29.6% on Agents’ Last Exam, 73.7% on DeepSWE v1.1, and output speeds reaching 200+ TPS. Pricing per million tokens is 1 yuan for input, 4 yuan for output, and 0.1 yuan for cache reads, with reported overall usage costs 70% below M3.

  2. Latent Space Recaps DeepSeek, MiniMax, and Mercury Model Releases

    Latent Space’s AINews recap covers DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, MiniMax M3.1 Flash, and Mercury 3, while noting they are not yet expected to see very wide use. It reports that DeepSeek’s model has a 1M-token context window and scores 45 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, tying GLM-5.3 for second among open-weight models. The recap also includes benchmark results, pricing, availability, and caveats for the releases.

  3. MiniMax releases M3.1 Flash with stronger reasoning and lower task costs

    MiniMax released M3.1 Flash, a reasoning model scoring 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up from M3’s 29, at less than half the cost per task. It supports text and images with up to one million tokens of context; API pricing is $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens. Artificial Analysis reports a 93 percent hallucination rate because it answers rather than declines uncertain questions; open weights are planned for October 23.

10/19
  1. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 42 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at lower task cost

    Artificial Analysis benchmarked MiniMax-M3.1-Flash at max effort, reporting an Intelligence Index score of 42, up 13 points from MiniMax-M3 and level with GLM-5.3-Flash, but behind DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 at 45. Its cost per Index task was ~$0.22 versus MiniMax-M3's ~$0.51, using ~189M output tokens. On AA-Omniscience, it answered 56% correctly but attempted almost every question, yielding a 93% hallucination rate and an overall score of 16.

Keep up with AI, one email a day

Model releases, price changes and compute developments, with original sources. Free, confirmed by email, and easy to unsubscribe. Read a past issue