3.2K views · 44 likes · 2 reposts (at collection)
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 42 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at lower task cost
- Who
- Artificial Analysis
- What
- benchmarks MiniMax-M3.1-Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and related evaluations
What happened
Artificial Analysis benchmarked MiniMax-M3.1-Flash at max effort, reporting an Intelligence Index score of 42, up 13 points from MiniMax-M3 and level with GLM-5.3-Flash, but behind DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 at 45. Its cost per Index task was ~$0.22 versus MiniMax-M3's ~$0.51, using ~189M output tokens. On AA-Omniscience, it answered 56% correctly but attempted almost every question, yielding a 93% hallucination rate and an overall score of 16.
The story so far
MiniMax released MiniMax-M3.1-Flash through its API, and Artificial Analysis reported that the model scored 42 on its Intelligence Index at maximum effort, up from MiniMax-M3’s 29, while costing less than half as much per Index task. Artificial Analysis estimated task costs at approximately $0.22 versus $0.51 for M3. The score tied GLM-5.3-Flash and trailed DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, which scored 45. The model supports text and image inputs with up to one million tokens of context. API pricing is $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens. Its weights are currently closed; MiniMax plans to release open weights on October 23. Artificial Analysis also found a weakness in its AA-Omniscience evaluation: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash answered 56% of questions correctly but attempted almost every question, producing a reported hallucination rate of 93% and an overall score of 16.
Keep reading
Latest daily · Issue 26VAST open-sources EdenLive world model with over 24FPS generation at 720PTomorrow at 08:00, a briefing like this arrives in your inbox.
The same kind of briefing as the one above: a few stories worth reading. Free. Mail starts after you confirm, and every letter has a one-click unsubscribe. Read a past issue · 2026-10-19
