Claude Code Team Describes Continuous Reviews by Claude Before Human Review

1 reports 1 reporting sources 7 hours agoNew

Understand the event

AI overview

The Claude Code team reviews changes continuously, with Claude reviewing and fixing most changes at least once before a human is asked to look, according to Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang. They describe choosing checks by asking what could go wrong and whether an automated check or a human reviewer is best suited to catch it, rather than treating whether a human has read the code as a proxy for adequate review.

Generated by AI from reports · Updated 6 hours ago

Latest development10/17 06:06 (UTC+8)

Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang on Code Review Simon Willison

Report timeline

Follow the reports to explore different sides of the event.

10/17

06:06
Simon Willison
Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang on Code Review
Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang say the Claude Code team reviews changes continuously, with Claude reviewing and fixing most changes at least once before a human looks. They describe asking what could go wrong and which check—automated or human—is right to catch it, rather than using whether a human read the code as a proxy.

Event heat trend

可比范围当前: 8
Peak within comparable coverage: 1010/17 07:00 (UTC+8)
近 24 小时变化: –

Trends compare the same continuously observed participants, which may cover fewer sources than current heat. Point or click to inspect hourly heat, or use left and right arrow keys.

Keep reading

Latest daily · Issue 24NVIDIA and AI4Bharat Introduce Nemotron-pretraining-Indic-v1 and an Open Data Generation Pipeline