Skip to content
K = 0.731

Nathan Lambert asks for Kimi 3.1 impressions after seeing few positive reactions

1 reports 1 reporting sources 2 hours agoNew

Understand the event

AI overview

Nathan Lambert said he was seeing few positive reactions to Kimi 3.1 on his X timeline and asked people who had tried the model to share their impressions. He said he had not yet tried it himself.

Generated by AI from reports · Updated 1 hours ago

Latest development10/24 19:49 (UTC+8)
Not a lot of positive Kimi 3.1 reactions on the timeline. If you've had time to try the model, what was your impression? (I haven't yet)Nathan Lambert · X

Read next

More changes in today’s briefingKimi K3.1 Pro ranks fourth on Artificial Analysis, approaching Claude Opus 5.5

Report timeline

Follow the reports to explore different sides of the event.

10/24
  1. Nathan Lambert · X
    Not a lot of positive Kimi 3.1 reactions on the timeline. If you've had time to try the model, what was your impression? (I haven't yet)

    Not a lot of positive Kimi 3.1 reactions on the timeline. If you've had time to try the model, what was your impression? (I haven't yet)

Keep up with AI, one email a day

Model releases, price changes and compute developments, with original sources. Free, confirmed by email, and easy to unsubscribe. Read a past issue

Event heat trend

There is not enough continuous observation data to plot a trend yet.