Aleph Alpha study: Chinese AI models including Qwen, DeepSeek, and Kimi often avoid sensitive topics or repeat official positions
Chinese AI models parrot state doctrine or refuse to answer on sensitive topics
What happened
Aleph Alpha tested Alibaba's Qwen, DeepSeek, and Moonshot AI's Kimi on 967 sensitive topics. Its in-house scoring system rated only 17% to 41% of responses as balanced; the rest repeated official positions, avoided the topic, or refused to answer.
DeepSeekQwenKimi / Moonshot AISafety and alignmentPapers and researchTrends#Research#Safety and alignment#Trends#DeepSeek#Anthropic
Keep reading
Latest daily · Issue 24NVIDIA and AI4Bharat Introduce Nemotron-pretraining-Indic-v1 and an Open Data Generation PipelineTrending now
- 1Meta Releases Muse Spark Open With Mac and Cloud Support, Topping US Open-Weight Index
- 2Google Launches Gemini 4 Argon Globally, Expands Paid Access as Benchmark Results Vary
- 3OpenAI Updates GPT-6 Astra Pro in ChatGPT With Parallel Agents and Faster Responses
- 4Meta’s New Business Terms Raise Dispute Over Website Crawling and AI Training Rights
Tomorrow at 08:00, a briefing like this arrives in your inbox.
The same kind of briefing as the one above: a few stories worth reading. Free. Mail starts after you confirm, and every letter has a one-click unsubscribe. Read a past issue · 2026-10-17