959 views · 25 likes · 2 reposts (at collection)
Nathan Lambert says Anthropic’s request for regulatory help preceded its distillation defenses
What happened
It’s bizarre to me how much noise Anthropic made asking for regulatory help before doing this. Hopefully this can reset the conversation. It was doubly bizarre because they emphasized the security risk of learning harmful behaviors from their leaky API. If the API is unsafe, don’t host it. Anthropic says it has made progress in reducing the effectiveness of distillation attacks against Claude and explains how: https://www.anthropic.com/research/distillation-defenses
The story so far
Anthropic said it has made significant progress over the past few months in reducing the effectiveness of distillation attacks against Claude and published a research post explaining its defenses. Nathan Lambert criticized Anthropic for seeking regulatory help before taking these steps. He also challenged the company’s emphasis on the security risk of learning harmful behaviors through its API, arguing that Anthropic should not host the API if it is unsafe. Lambert said he hoped the reported progress would reset the conversation.
Keep reading
Latest daily · Issue 24NVIDIA and AI4Bharat Introduce Nemotron-pretraining-Indic-v1 and an Open Data Generation PipelineTrending now
- 1Meta Releases Muse Spark Open With Mac and Cloud Support, Topping US Open-Weight Index
- 2Google Launches Gemini 4 Argon Globally, Expands Paid Access as Benchmark Results Vary
- 3OpenAI Updates GPT-6 Astra Pro in ChatGPT With Parallel Agents and Faster Responses
- 4Meta’s New Business Terms Raise Dispute Over Website Crawling and AI Training Rights
Tomorrow at 08:00, a briefing like this arrives in your inbox.
The same kind of briefing as the one above: a few stories worth reading. Free. Mail starts after you confirm, and every letter has a one-click unsubscribe. Read a past issue · 2026-10-17
