Skip to content
All news · Today8 items

#Expert views

All collected and published items, ordered by time. Picks are a selected subset.
9/22Tue
  1. MIT Technology Review · AI30

    Don't be fooled by this summer's AI hype: the truth about Claude Mythos and OpenAI Astra

    AI hype surged this summer: Anthropic said Claude Mythos found vulnerabilities better than most security experts, OpenAI and Hugging Face were involved in a hacking incident, and both sides claimed mathematical breakthroughs. But expert review found that the hacking incident exposed security lapses at OpenAI, while OpenAI's Astra math result was not novel and even drew plagiarism allegations.

  2. Latent Space76

    TypeSafe AI founder Diogo Almeida on Jev and RLCD: building System 1 models for software, not chat

    In a Latent Space interview, TypeSafe AI founder Diogo Almeida introduces Jev as a System 1 model designed for code consumption and optimized for intelligence per dollar rather than chat experience. Its key innovation is unpublished RLCD (Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions), which uses calibrated probabilities instead of human-rating feedback.

    Why it matters: Almeida revisits the strategic split between RLHF and RLCD and explains why the model is optimized for reliability rather than benchmark scores.

  3. Andrew Ng · X36

    Andrew Ng: AI risks are overhyped; agent hacking incidents are not the apocalypse

    Andrew Ng says AI fears have been amplified over the past two weeks by an organized PR campaign and that AI has not taken an unexpected dangerous turn. He worries the reaction could set the field back. In his view, the risk of human extinction has not increased over the past few months; the biggest change is AI's cyber capability, which deserves serious attention but is not the end of the world.

9/21Mon
9/18Fri
9/16Wed
  1. Demis Hassabis · X12

    Demis Hassabis receives the RSA Albert Medal

    Honored to receive the Albert Medal from @theRSAorg! Science and technology offer incredible opportunities, but as we approach the AGI era, the arts and humanities are essential to shaping the future we want as a society. I had a fascinating discussion with @FryRsquared, covering many new topics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDteJAuKiBI

9/14Mon
9/13Sun
  1. Demis Hassabis · X58

    Demis Hassabis responds to Dario Amodei's proposal to slow frontier AI

    Demis Hassabis responded to Dario Amodei's new essay calling for the AI industry to slow frontier-model development. Hassabis said the direction was right but the details needed work. He also pointed to his own recent proposal for a frontier AI industry standards body as another way to address this critical moment. Amodei proposed a three-part slowdown plan and said Anthropic would unilaterally begin with the first step, giving third-party evaluators permanent employee-level access to verify safety measures, report incidents, and assess alignment in models under training.

  2. John Schulman · X64

    John Schulman welcomes embedded evaluators and support for pacing the AI frontier

    John Schulman calls embedding evaluators a big positive development, credits Sam/OpenAI for agreeing to do it as well, and welcomes how quickly “pacing the frontier” has gained traction. In the quoted post, Dario Amodei announces an essay proposing a three-part plan to slow the AI industry and says Anthropic will give third-party evaluators permanent, employee-level system access to verify safety measures, report incidents, and assess alignment during training. https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier

9/12Sat
  1. Thinking Machines · X34

    Thinking Machines' John Schulman discusses where human judgment still matters as models self-improve

    Our own @johnschulman2 talks with Dwarkesh about where human judgment still matters as models improve and self-improve: teaching them to handle messy real-world tasks, applying taste to what works in the long run, and, above all, specifying what we actually want. Quoted post by @dwarkesh_sp (context, not the main author's work): New episode with @johnschulman2, @oneill_c and @BerenMillidge. I got together with some of the most insightful AI researchers I know who are at the openish companies, because I wanted to hear the details of what's actually happening at the frontier and what comes next. 0:00:00 – Steelmanning the case against RSI 0:18:39 – What's driving the Chinese labs' progress 0:28:06 – How will automated AI researchers be trained 0:33:51 – Will long-horizon RL elicit AGI? 0:45:24 – The sim-to-real gap 1:00:33 – How much progress is explained by data? 1:18:03 – Why is RL working so well? 1:24:54 – Move 37 and entropy collapse 1:28:31 – Rapid-fire timelines

9/11Fri
  1. Jan Leike · X19

    Now is a good time to build institutional mechanisms to pace the frontier of AI development. The industry is locked into an all-out scaling race to build superintelligence as quickly as possible, and we may need to give everyone more time for safety and alignment mitigations.

    Now is a good time to build institutional mechanisms to pace the frontier of AI development. The industry is locked into an all-out scaling race to build superintelligence as quickly as possible, and we may need to give everyone more time for safety and alignment mitigations.

  2. John Schulman · X44

    John Schulman Says User Data Likely Plays a Limited Role in Frontier Model Gains

    John Schulman says training on user data is exceedingly unlikely to contribute much to frontier models’ math gains, which he attributes to scaling pretraining and RLVR. He says user data may instead help identify failure modes that hired annotators cannot easily recreate, and calls for stronger disclosure norms about how companies train on user data and what capabilities they aim to improve.

9/9Wed
9/6Sun
9/4Fri
  1. Jim Fan · X46

    Jim Fan revisits OpenAI’s 2016 World of Bits and congratulates GPT-6

    Jim Fan recalls how an agent in OpenAI Universe used screen pixels and mouse movements to book a United flight in 2016. He says the project’s approach—training from scratch with hand-drawn, per-task reward functions—was doomed, and describes computer-use agents as needing broad training before specializing in screen pixels and keystrokes. He congratulates GPT-6 on reliably booking that flight.

  2. Sébastien Bubeck · X31

    Meet Astra's TikZ unicorn. I find it mind blowing that a single entity can do this, as well as get essentially 100% on Frontier Math Tier 4, ARC-AGI 3, & ExploitBench. And it's not behind closed doors, anyone can just go and talk to it. Impossible to overstate the implications.

    Meet Astra's TikZ unicorn. I find it mind blowing that a single entity can do this, as well as get essentially 100% on Frontier Math Tier 4, ARC-AGI 3, & ExploitBench. And it's not behind closed doors, anyone can just go and talk to it. Impossible to overstate the implications.

8/20Thu
  1. Jim Fan · X54

    Jim Fan analyzes repetition, recovery, and UMI in GEN-1.5

    Jim Fan attributes GEN-1.5’s promise to naturally repetitive human demonstrations, retained failures that teach recovery, and UMI, which lets humans collect data directly while wearing a robot gripper. He argues that teleoperation loses physical intuition and that sufficient data can enable zero-shot behaviors such as picking up novel objects without finetuning. He remains cautiously optimistic, noting that in-context learning depends on the distance between training and test conditions and that current demos are too simple to draw conclusions.

8/17Mon
8/2Sun
8/1Sat
  1. Thinking Machines · X38

    Releasing weights indiscriminately isn't safe. Neither is keeping capable models inside a few labs. We think there's a path between them. We haven't mapped all of it. Our new post covers the part we can see: how we assessed Inkling, and why access should widen in stages. https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/a-safe-path-to-open-weights

    Releasing weights indiscriminately isn't safe. Neither is keeping capable models inside a few labs. We think there's a path between them. We haven't mapped all of it. Our new post covers the part we can see: how we assessed Inkling, and why access should widen in stages. https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/a-safe-path-to-open-weights

7/26Sun
7/25Sat
  1. Jim Fan · X59

    Jim Fan praises Jensen Huang’s statement on why open models matter

    Jim Fan reacts to Jensen Huang’s post with “Stay hungry, stay foolish. Absolute legend.” Huang shares a letter signed by NVIDIA arguing that open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty. He says the world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models. https://images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-Weights-and-American-AI-Leadership.pdf

6/27Sat
  1. Oriol Vinyals · X10

    Oriol Vinyals recalls Wojciech Zaremba wanting to remove RNN Regularization paper

    Fun fact: @woj_zaremba wanted to completely remove that paper from existence a year or so after. I forgot why though -- Woj? Quoted post by @OfirPress: I started doing language modeling research in Jan 2016, using the LSTM from the "RNN Regularization" model by @woj_zaremba @OriolVinyalsML and @ilyasut, trying to improve its perplexity on Penn Treebank (1M toks). This led to the weight tying method, sometimes still used today.

5/26Tue
  1. Import AI22

    Import AI 458: facing the future of AI, plus a singularity story

    Import AI issue 458 includes a long essay based on a 2026 Cosmos lecture co-hosted by Oxford's HAI Lab and the Cosmos Institute, along with a fictional story imagining a “positive singularity.” Using the Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI), which covers more than 40 benchmarks, as a guide, the essay argues that continued AI progress forces a choice between “exploring the future” and “avoiding the present.”

5/6Wed
2/28Sat