Skip to content
K = 0.731Subscribe

Ethan Mollick says AI can give substantive feedback on academic papers

1 reports 1 reporting sources Updated 1 hours ago

Understand the event

AI overview

Ethan Mollick said AI can provide insightful feedback on academic work when used properly, and encouraged researchers to ask GPT-6 Pro or Opus 5.5 High for substantive feedback on their papers. He noted that people are still debating how AI should be used to review academic work.

Generated by AI from reports · Updated 18 minutes ago

Latest development11/4 00:43 (UTC+8)
We are in an era of flux & fighting over how AI should be used to review academic work But it is worth proving to yourself that yes, AI used properly can be quite insightful at this, by asking GPT-6 Pro/Opus 5.5 High to give helpful, substantive feedback on one of your papers.Ethan Mollick · X

Read next

More changes in today’s briefingOpenAI’s updated Model Spec explained through its five core values

Report timeline

Follow the reports to explore different sides of the event.

11/4
  1. Ethan Mollick · X
    We are in an era of flux & fighting over how AI should be used to review academic work But it is worth proving to yourself that yes, AI used properly can be quite insightful at this, by asking GPT-6 Pro/Opus 5.5 High to give helpful, substantive feedback on one of your papers.

    We are in an era of flux & fighting over how AI should be used to review academic work But it is worth proving to yourself that yes, AI used properly can be quite insightful at this, by asking GPT-6 Pro/Opus 5.5 High to give helpful, substantive feedback on one of your papers.

Keep up with AI, one email a day

Model releases, price changes and compute developments, with original sources. Free, confirmed by email, and easy to unsubscribe. Read a past issue

Event heat trend

There is not enough continuous observation data to plot a trend yet.