Skip to content

Long-Horizon Terminal-Bench

Tencent HY / Lehigh et al. / Coding · Sustained terminal use to complete complex engineering and tool tasks over longer periods.
Across e/accUnder observation
Evidence budgetNot scored
Upstream data timeUnverified
Last successful syncCollection not started

What it measures and how

Compare 90-minute, 2-hour and 3-hour budgets separately. Judging protocols before and after fixes cannot be ranked together. The best results from different Agents are not common model scores.

How this evidence is used

Candidate under observation: awaiting new batches explicitly identifying the fixed protocol. Existing old scores are not automatically collected into public boards or ranked. This does not claim every old result exploited a flaw.

Limitations and attribution

The organization disclosed judging-information leakage. Current evidence does not establish that existing scores use the same isolated judging protocol. Task-source overlap with other professional benchmarks needs review.

Data license: Apache 2.0 · Official IntelligenceLab/LHTB-leaderboard results dataset; retain attribution and change notes.

Results are published by Tencent HY / Lehigh et al.. Raw scores and the e/acc consensus index use different scales and cannot be added directly.