Skip to content
Original
OpinionNathan Lambert · X· @natolambert·· 3 hours ago

3.6K views · 71 likes · 1 reposts (at collection)

Nathan Lambert Says Chinese Open Model Labs Have Met Their Weight Release Promises

Who
Nathan Lambert
What
comments on Chinese open model labs’ track record of meeting promised weight release timelines
Quote
Very interesting how the open model labs in China always have delivered on their promises of when weights come out.

What happened

Nathan Lambert says Chinese open model labs have consistently delivered weights on their promised schedules, but predicts that one will eventually back out of a model timeline. He links to a post stating that K3.1 weights dropped under a MaaS and revenue gated license.

Read next

See the full storyNathan Lambert Discusses Chinese Labs’ Open Model Weight Release Timelines
Article

Very interesting how the open model labs in China always have delivered on their promises of when weights come out. Will be telling when one of them finally backs out of a certain model timeline (feels inevitable). https://twitter.com/xeophon/status/2118004435368792068

Quoted postFlorian Brand@xeophon
K3.1 weights dropped MaaS + revenue gated license
View the quoted post on X

The story so far

Nathan Lambert said Chinese open model labs have consistently released model weights when promised, and predicted that one of them will eventually miss a promised timeline. He linked to a post saying K3.1 weights were released under a license gated by model-as-a-service access and revenue.

Keep up with AI, one email a day

Model releases, price changes and compute developments, with original sources. Free, confirmed by email, and easy to unsubscribe. Read a past issue · 2026-11-04