1K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts (at collection)
Nanbeige Releases Open-Weights Nanbeige4.3-33B Reasoning Model
- Who
- Nanbeige
- What
- released Nanbeige4.3-33B, an open weights model
- Quote
Nanbeige has released Nanbeige4.3-33B, an open weights model matching Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) at 20 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 with stronger terminal use but weaker knowledge
What happened
Artificial Analysis reports that Nanbeige has released Nanbeige4.3-33B, a dense, open-weights reasoning model with 33B parameters and an Apache 2.0 license. It scores 20 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5, matching Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh), with stronger Terminal-Bench 4.0 and CritPt v2 Hard Subset results but lower scores on several knowledge and coding benchmarks. The model supports text input and output and has a 524K-token context window.
Read next
See the full storyNanbeige Releases Open-Weights Nanbeige4.3-33B Reasoning ModelNanbeige has released Nanbeige4.3-33B, an open weights model matching Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) at 20 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 with stronger terminal use but weaker knowledge
@Nanbeige is the foundation model research team at BOSS Zhipin, the Chinese recruitment platform operated by Kanzhun Limited. Its dense 33B reasoning model is open weights under Apache 2.0, with text input and output only, a 524K-token context window, and is small enough to run locally on a laptop.
Key results:
➤ Competitive results at ~30B total parameters. Nanbeige4.3-33B and Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) both score 20, compared with 6 for Muse Glimmer (high, 30B).
➤ Terminal use and physics reasoning are relative strengths. Nanbeige scores 30% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and 16% on CritPt v2's Hard Subset, vs. 6% and 4% respectively for Qwen3.8 27B.
➤ Different strengths to Qwen3.8 27B despite the same overall score. Nanbeige beats Qwen3.8 27B on AutomationBench-AA (53% vs. 48%), but trails on AA-Briefcase v1.1 (1162 vs. 1391 Elo), FrontierCode 2.0 (11% vs. 15%) and HLE-Diamond (7% vs. 15%).
➤ High abstention and low hallucination rates on Omniscience. Nanbeige scores -4 on AA-Omniscience v1.1 vs. -6 for Qwen3.8 27B, with a hallucination rate of 18% vs. 29%. It answers fewer questions correctly (12% vs. 17%) and declines 71% of questions.
➤ Similar intelligence with more output tokens per task. Nanbeige used 158K output tokens per Intelligence Index task vs. 110K for Qwen3.8 27B, about 44% more.
Additional model details:
➤ Type: Open weights reasoning (Apache 2.0 license)
➤ Size: 33B total parameters (dense)
➤ Modalities: Text input and output only
➤ Context window: 524K
➤ API availability: No confirmed public first- or third-party APIs
The story so far
Nanbeige released Nanbeige4.3-33B, a 33-billion-parameter dense reasoning model with open weights under the Apache 2.0 license. It accepts and generates text and has a 524K-token context window. Artificial Analysis gave the model a score of 20 on its Intelligence Index v5, matching Qwen3.8 27B at the xhigh setting. It scored higher on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and CritPt v2 Hard Subset, but lower on several knowledge and coding benchmarks.
Keep up with AI, one email a day
Model releases, price changes and compute developments, with original sources. Free, confirmed by email, and easy to unsubscribe. Read a past issue · 2026-11-05
