1.7K views · 44 likes · 0 reposts (at collection)
Tencent Hunyuan Thanks Artificial Analysis for Its Evaluation
- Who
- Tencent Hunyuan
- What
- responded to Artificial Analysis’s evaluation of the Hy4 model
- When
- Quote
Thanks for the evaluation!
What happened
@ArtificialAnlys reported that Hy4 scored 35 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 and ranked as the #2 model from a China-based AI lab. Tencent Hunyuan thanked them for the evaluation and said it would keep improving 🙏 https://twitter.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2118259055546482834
Read next
See the full storyArtificial Analysis Ranks Tencent’s Hy4 Second Among China-Based AI Lab ModelsThanks for the evaluation! We’ll keep improving 🙏 https://twitter.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2118259055546482834
Hy4 from Tencent scores 35 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 and is the #2 model from a China-based AI lab Hy4 is the latest model from @TencentHunyuan and is the successor to Hy3 released earlier this year. It scores 35 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5, equal with Grok 4.7 (xhigh) and 1 point behind Claude Haiku 5.5 (max). Hy4 is the #2 model from a China-based AI lab, behind only Kimi K3.1 Pro, which scores 46. Hy4 is priced at $0.834/$2.501 per 1M input/output tokens. Key takeaways: ➤ Hy4 excels at agentic coding tasks. Hy4 scores 31% on FrontierCode 2.0, compared to 32% for Claude Fable 5.1 (max). It is the leading model from a China-based AI lab, with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max) scoring 28% and Kimi K3.1 Pro scoring 25%. On Terminal-Bench 4.0, it scores 37%, the fourth-highest score among models from China-based AI labs ➤ Hy4 outperforms its peers on knowledge and reasoning. Hy4 achieves accuracy of 50% on AA-Omniscience v1.1, 1 point ahead of Kimi K3.1 Pro, but has a high hallucination rate of 89% compared to Kimi K3.1 Pro’s 37%. On HLE-Diamond, it scores 33% compared to Kimi K3.1 Pro’s 37% ➤ Hy4 offers a competitive Capability vs. Cost trade-off compared to to peers. With a Cost per Intelligence Index Task of $0.78, Hy4 (35) is 10-times cheaper than Grok 4.7 (xhigh, 35) and 13-times cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (34) but almost twice as expensive as Claude Haiku 5.5 (max, 36) Other model details: ➤ Context window: 1 million tokens ➤ Pricing: $0.834/$2.501 per 1M input/output tokens. Cache reads $0.042 per 1M tokens ➤ Multimodality: Text and image input, with text outputView the quoted post on X
The story so far
Artificial Analysis scored Tencent’s Hy4 at 35 on its Intelligence Index v5, matching Grok 4.7 (xhigh) and ranking second among models from China-based AI labs. It also reported Hy4’s coding and reasoning results, an 89% hallucination rate on AA-Omniscience v1.1, a $0.78 cost per Intelligence Index task, and a 1 million token context window. Tencent Hunyuan thanked Artificial Analysis for the evaluation and said it would keep improving Hy4.
Keep up with AI, one email a day
Model releases, price changes and compute developments, with original sources. Free, confirmed by email, and easy to unsubscribe. Read a past issue · 2026-11-05
